• Home
  • Welcome to Dinologue!
  • Dinovision on YouTube

Dinologue

Paleo Today: Your fossil fix throughout the ages, from the Mesozoic Era and beyond!

  • Fossil Fix
  • Paleo Lately
    • Paleo Myth Busters
    • Paleo Mailbag
  • Paleo Adventures
    • Inside the Museum
  • Pop Paleontology
    • #DinosInMyDay
    • Dinos-R-Us
  • Dear Dinosaur
    • Entertaining with Dinosaurs
  • Dinosaur Enthusiasts
    • Brian Switek
    • Erica Hargreave
    • Lori Yearwood
You are here: Home / Archives for palaeontology

What’s in a Name – It Matters What We Call Prehistoric Species

April 23, 2015 By Brian Switek Leave a Comment

To the glee of many, Brontosaurus came stomping back last week. A new analysis recovered the great “thunder lizard” from taxonomic exile, and there’s a definitely maybe a chance that it’ll stick around.

A modern restoration of Brontosaurus. Art: Davide Bonadonna, CC- BY NC SA.

A modern restoration of Brontosaurus. Art: Davide Bonadonna, CC- BY NC SA.

But every party needs a pooper. Some palaeontologists and fossil fans aren’t especially happy with all the attention Brontosaurus has received. It’s just a name, after all, and the sauropod’s mythological girth overshadowed more important parts of the study that argued for the dinosaur’s resurrection. (For example, splitting out a new sauropod from bones previously thought to be Diplodocus and the significance of the method used to achieve these results.)

Among the most vocal of all the critics is Australian Broadcasting Corporation commentator Dr. Paul Willis. The “boffinery” surrounding the Brontosaurus name game, Willis writes, irritates the hell out of him because:

It plays to the stereotype of the useless palaeontologist, stamp collecting extinct creatures and arguing over what was and what was not a different species. While this is an important discussion to have within dinosaur palaeontology, popularizing the debate serves to trivialize the science.

Willis goes on to say that the real importance of the fossil record comes from what the past can teach us about the present, and perhaps even the future. On that point, I wholeheartedly agree. But delving into why Brontosaurus blips in and out of existence is not at all trivial. Aside from giving scientists and writers an opportunity to talk about taxonomy – an oft-neglected but essential science – figuring out what a fossil creature should be called is a critical step towards drawing out the grander patterns Willis has enthused about.

Reading Willis’ complaint reminded me of a nasty book review published over a century ago. In the pages of London’s Geological Magazine, a reviewer hidden behind the title “H” derided naturalist Joseph Leidy‘s 1865 monograph Cretaceous Reptiles of the United States for being little more than an illustrated catalog of fossil reptiles. “[I]t is the least able contribution to palaeontology that we remember,” the arrogant reviewer concluded, and added another kick for good measure: “Its best praise is that it contains no quackery; its worst condemnation is that it contains no science.”

Plate XI from "Cretaceous Reptiles of the United States"

Plate XI from “Cretaceous Reptiles of the United States” (1865). All of the fossils shown here are vertebrae (neck, back and tail bones) from Hadrosaurus foulkii.

But as historian Keith Thomson later pointed out, Leidy really was doing quality science. He was one of a handful of pioneering palaeontologists in North America. At the time Leidy was working there was only the barest hint of the great fossil riches to be found in the West, and the prehistoric creatures exhumed from the Eastern North America hadn’t been adequately identified. Geologists in Europe, meanwhile, had already laid such groundwork and had moved on to theorizing about the interrelationships and succession of life. If Leidy had spent his report speculating about the ebb and flow of prehistoric life, the same reviewer probably would have criticized him for not sorting out North America’s fossil diversity first.

Willis is talking about the media and H about another research, but, all the same, their complaints were cast from the same mold. Organizing your dinosaurs is “stamp collecting” that is of interest only to specialists, and even then it holds no satisfying implications or conclusions. But I’m with Leidy. How can we possibly understand patterns and transitions in the history of life if we don’t continually strive to bring taxonomy and phylogeny in as close accord with nature as possible? How can we identify relationships between ancestors and descendants, or calculate the damage of a mass extinction, if we don’t have some sort of framework by which we distinguish one species from another?

Let’s narrow this down to Brontosaurus itself. The bones of this dinosaur are found in the upper reaches of western North America’s Morrison Formation – rocks between 156 and 146 million years old that are brimming with plant-scarfing giants. In addition to Brontosaurus, a slew of other sauropods including multiple species of Camarasaurus, Apatosaurus, and Diplodocus have been found, as well as the rarer Brachiosaurus, Barosaurus, Supersaurus, and more, some of which haven’t even been named yet.

Sometimes a mix of these species are found together and other times they are isolated, but, all the same, the great floodplains of the Jurassic West hosted tons upon tons of these giant herbivorous dinosaurs. How were these distributed through time and space? Were these dinosaurs really browsing shoulder-to-shoulder, or did they somehow divvy up the habitat to avoid competition? We need to understand the sauropods in their proper place and time to start approaching these questions, and that requires identifying and delineating between species. Likewise, once we know who’s living where and when, paleontologists can better reconstruct the pattern of this sauropod explosion and perhaps tease out clues as to what led to the repeated evolution of such giants. Efforts to understand modern biodiversity offers an obvious parallel – if you want to comprehend ecology and how it’s changing, you need to know who’s who within the habitat you’re scrutinizing. Paleontology can’t proceed without taxonomy.

Would a Brontosaurus by any other name be as awesome? Yes. But that doesn’t mean that we should disregard the logic and debate behind the title. If we hope to understand Brontosaurus at all – how it evolved, the way it lived, why it went extinct – we first need to consider what to call it.

Filed Under: Brian Switek, Dinosaur Enthusiasts, Fossil Fix, Paleo Lately Tagged With: Brontosaurus, Cretaceous Reptiles of the United States, Joseph Leidy, Jurassic West, Keith Thomson, palaeontology, taxonomy, What's in a Name

R.2395, a Paleontology Profile

March 23, 2015 By Brian Switek Leave a Comment

Pterosaur R.2395, as depicted by Mark Witton.

Pterosaur R.2395, as restored by Mark Witton.

Name: R.2395

Meaning: This pterosaur does not have a formal scientific name yet, so palaeontologists refer to it by its specimen number.

Age: Between 72 and 66 million years old

Where in the world?: Romania’s Haţeg Basin

What sort of critter?: Not a dinosaur, but a pterosaur belonging to a large-bodied subgroup called azhdarchids.

Size: Unknown, but R.2395 is estimated to have had a wingspan of about 10 feet.

How much of the creature’s body is known?: A single neck vertebra.

Claim to fame: Describing a new animal on the basis of a single bone might seem odd, but palaeontologist Mátyás Vremir and colleagues did so because the fossil represents an animal not yet seen in the Cretaceous rock of Romania. The anatomy of the fossil indicates that it’s the fourth neck vertebra from a medium-sized pterosaur, and the bone suggests that this animal had a shorter, thicker neck than other pterosaurs belonging to the same group. While more of the skeleton needs to be found to be sure, this single bone suggests that an unusual pterosaur flew over the heads of Haţeg Island’s dinosaurs.

For more on this discovery, read palaeontologist Mark Witton’s post here.

Reference:

Vremir, M., Witton, M, Naish, D., Dyke, G., Brusatte, S., Norell, M, Totoianu, R. 2015. A medium-sized robust-necked azhdarchid pterosaur (Pterodactyloidea: Azhdarchidae) from the Maastrichtian of Pui (Haţeg Basin, Transylvania, Romania). American Museum Novitates. 3827: 1-16.

Filed Under: Brian Switek, Dinosaur Enthusiasts, Fossil Fix, Paleo Profile Tagged With: azhdarchids, Cretaceous, Hateg Basin, Haţeg Island, Mátyás Vremir, palaeontology, paleontology, pterosaur, R.2395, Romania

#2014SVP PaleoMailbag Questions for the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 74th Annual Meeting

November 4, 2014 By Erica Hargreave 1 Comment

Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 74th Annual MeetingWe are all a little jealous of Brian Switek this week, as he is off geeking out and hanging out with a number of great minds in paleontology at the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Annual Meeting in Berlin.  Basically this doesn’t just translate to fabulously interesting conversations that we are missing out on, but also good German beer and sausages … aaaaaaACKKKK!!!

To ease the pain, Brian has promised to let us be a fly on the wall of some of his dinotastic paleo chats by filming ‘In Conversations With’ some of the great paleontological minds of the day.  And he has even promised to ask some questions from us for a #2014SVP edition of PaleoMailbag, if we are quick about it and send questions to him before he and his camera find themselves chatting with the various literati of the paleo world!

So who will Brian be chatting with at #2014SVP, that we can share our desired questions for in the comments below?

Well, not to put too much pressure on Brian, we know he has absolutely promised to corner:

  • non-avian dinosaur paleontologist Steve Brusatte
  • ungulate palaeobiologist Jessica Theodor
  • evolutionary croc specialist Stephanie Drumheller-Horton
  • dinosaur biomechanic guy Henrich Mallison
  • natural history illustrator and biologist Julius Csotonyi

But as Brian enjoys getting around, he is going to try and chat with many more paleo literati, including: tetrapod biodiversity and extinction PhD student Jon Tennant, vertebrate functional morphology and evolution prof Casey Holliday, paleontology student Danny Vidal, paleontologist / geologist Don Prothero, evolution and palaeobiology of ankylosaurid dinosaur PhD student Victoria Arbour,  Triassic crocodile-line archosaurs grad student Susan Drymala, palaeontologist Paul Barrett, and paleoecology PhD student and podcaster Ryan Haupt, who have already expressed interest in being on camera for all of you!

Brian Switek

Brian had just better be forewarned, while allowing us to partake in #2014SVP conversations through his camera is most appreciated, taunting us with photo or video of him enjoying German beer and sausages is liable to bring out the T rex (in me, at least)!  And yes, to answer your next question (and to forewarn), I do bite!

So be good young dinos now and pop your questions in the comments below!

Filed Under: Brian Switek, Dinosaur Enthusiasts, Erica Hargreave, Fossil Fix, Paleo Adventures Tagged With: #2014SVP, #PaleoMailbag, Brian Switek, Casey Holliday, Danny Vidal, Don Prothero, Henrich Mallison, Jessica Theodor, Jon Tennant, Julius Csotonyi, palaeontogists, palaeontology, paleontologists, paleontology, Paul Barrett, Ryan Haupt, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 74th Annual Meeting, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Annual Meeting, Stephanie Drumheller-Horton, Steve Brusatte, Susan Drymala, Victoria Arbour

Uncover More!

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Rambles

Solving the Mystery of Seagrass Evolution

Solving the Mystery of Seagrass Evolution

Plant evolution is important to consider in the evolution of life on Earth and … Dig Further ...

  • Mangroves: From the Late Cretaceous to the Eocene to Today – A Testament to Resilience
  • When Whales Started to See the Ocean With Sound
  • Tesnusocaris goldichi, a Paleontology Profile

Copyright © 2014–2018 · From the Curious Minds at Parallax Film Productions · Login